Tuesday, April 29, 2025

History Repeating at Indusind Bank

There is an interesting parallel between IndusInd Bank's current situation and Axis Bank's 2018 episode—both involve:

  • A regulator-triggered disruption (Axis: NPA divergence, IndusInd: derivative accounting issues).

  • CEO's tenure cut short or not extended (Shikha Sharma denied extension; Sumant Kathpalia exiting before term completion as on 29th april 2025).

  • A committee of executives managing operations temporarily.

Let’s break this down:


🕒 How Long Might IndusInd Take to Appoint a New CEO?

Based on past precedents:

🔹 Axis Bank (2018):

  • Shikha Sharma’s early exit announced: April 2018

  • New CEO (Amitabh Chaudhry) appointed: September 2018

  • Time taken: ~5 months

🔹 Yes Bank (2018–19):

  • Rana Kapoor’s extension denied: September 2018

  • New CEO (Ravneet Gill) appointed: January 2019

  • Time taken: ~4 months

🔹 IndusInd Bank (2025):

  • CEO exit announced in on 29th April 2025

  • If RBI and the board follow a normal process, a new CEO could be finalized between August and October 2025 (i.e., 4–6 months).

So you can reasonably expect the new CEO to be named by Q2 FY26, with continuity in operations ensured through the executive committee in the meantime.

Wednesday, April 23, 2025

Great Businesses ≠ Great Investments

 “The best business at the wrong price is a bad investment.” - Warren Buffett

The 1970s "Nifty Fifty" episode is one of the most important and misunderstood lessons in market history, and Howard Marks often refers to it to illustrate the dangers of overpaying, regardless of business quality.

🧠 What Was the Nifty Fifty?

The Nifty Fifty were a group of ~50 large-cap U.S. companies that were considered one-decision stocks in the late 1960s and early 1970s. These were dominant, high-growth, high-quality businesses like:

  • Coca-Cola

  • IBM

  • Polaroid

  • McDonald’s

  • Johnson & Johnson

  • Xerox

  • Disney

  • Pfizer

  • Procter & Gamble

They were considered so bulletproof that investors thought you could buy them at any price and just hold forever.


📉 What Happened in the 1970s?

By the early 1970s, these companies were trading at sky-high P/E ratios of 50–80x, compared to a market average P/E of 15.

Then came the crash (1973–74):

  • The oil crisis, stagflation (high inflation + low growth), and tight monetary policy caused a major bear market.

  • The S&P 500 dropped ~50% from 1973–1974.

  • Many Nifty Fifty stocks fell even more — despite being great companies.

Here are some examples:

  • Polaroid: -91%

  • Avon: -86%

  • Xerox: -71%

  • McDonald's: -71%

  • Disney: -68%

Even though these were quality businesses, the valuation bubble burst. Investors had paid too much for perfection.


💡 Howard Marks’ Key Lesson: “It’s not what you buy; it’s what you pay.”

Howard Marks was involved in investing around that time and admits losing money on great companies — simply because he overpaid. His key takeaways:

  1. Valuation matters. Even great companies can deliver poor returns if bought at high prices.

  2. Investor psychology drives risk. The more people agree a stock is "safe," the more dangerous it becomes — due to crowding and inflated valuations.

  3. No company is worth an infinite price. “Growth at any price” is dangerous.

  4. Mean reversion happens — both in performance and in valuation multiples.

Nifty Fifty Collapse: P/E Compression and Price Crash



P/E in 1972–73

P/E in 1974–75

Price Drop from Peak
Polaroid~90x~20x-91%
Avon Products~65x~15x-86%
Xerox~45x~13x-71%
McDonald's~75x~18x-71%
Walt Disney~80x~15x-68%
Coca-Cola~45x~12x-68%
Johnson & Johnson~60x~14x-60%
IBM~50x~12x-55%
Merck~50x~13x-56%
Philip Morris~30x~8x-45%
Pfizer~55x~14x-57%
PepsiCo~50x~12x-50%
Gillette~55x~10x-62%
Procter & Gamble~40x~11x-58%
Colgate-Palmolive~45x~12x-59%
Eli Lilly~60x~15x-61%
Minnesota Mining (3M)~35x~9x-50%

🎯 Key Observations:

  • The average P/E fell from ~50–60x to ~10–15x, a compression of 70–80% in valuation multiples.

  • Stock prices collapsed not because earnings fell massively — but because the market stopped paying sky-high prices.

  • Many of these stocks eventually recovered and became long-term wealth creators — but it took a decade or more to break even.


💡 Lessons We Can Apply Today:

  • P/E expansion can fuel a bull market — but P/E contraction can erase it in a flash.

  • Great companies are not immune to valuation risk.

  • If you buy at 60x earnings, even 20% growth for 5 years might not save you from multiple compression.

The interest rate environment played a huge role in the Nifty Fifty collapse, and it's a key part of the puzzle. Here's the backdrop:


📆 US Interest Rates (1970–1975)

YearFed Funds Rate (approx.)Notes
1970~7.75%High inflation begins creeping in
1971~4.5%Fed eases post-recession (Nixon shock, end of Bretton Woods)
1972~5.25%Easy money continues; asset bubbles inflate
1973~10.75%Inflation surges (OPEC oil embargo), Fed tightens rapidly
1974~13.0%Interest rates peak amid stagflation
1975~5.25%Fed cuts rates to fight deep recession

📉 Why This Matters for Nifty Fifty Valuations:

  • In 1971–72, falling interest rates made investors hungry for long-duration, high-quality stocks (similar to recent years). They were willing to pay 50–90x P/E for "never-fail" growth names.

  • In 1973–74, as rates surged above 10%, those same stocks saw P/E multiples collapse. With bonds yielding 10–13%, investors demanded much higher equity risk premiums.

  • The crash wasn't caused by earnings collapse — it was driven by macro tightening and inflation fears. Sound familiar?

Thursday, April 10, 2025

Enantiodromia and the Indian Tea Sector: A Brewing Comeback

In the rhythms of history and markets, there’s a fascinating Greek term that captures the essence of dramatic turnarounds: enantiodromia. Coined by the philosopher Heraclitus and popularized by Carl Jung, enantiodromia means that anything that reaches an extreme will eventually turn into its opposite. In simple terms, when a system goes too far in one direction, it corrects by swinging back the other way. And nowhere is this psychological and philosophical concept more relevant today than in the Indian tea industry.

The Long Decline

Over the past decade, India’s tea sector has endured a structural downtrend. Prices have stagnated, costs have soared, and major players have either exited or downsized. Many plantations have suffered from underinvestment, labor issues, low productivity, and excessive supply of low-grade teas flooding auctions. Quality producers have been punished along with poor ones as the market failed to differentiate, leading to an industry-wide erosion of profitability.

Even large business houses like the Apeejay Group and the McLeod Russel empire have either exited or fallen into distress. Sentiment around tea as an investible sector has remained deeply pessimistic. Government intervention has been minimal, and working capital cycles for producers have worsened. All these are classic signs of an industry stretched to the extreme of neglect and apathy.

Signs of a Reversal: The First Echoes of Enantiodromia

But as enantiodromia teaches us, extreme neglect and oversupply set the stage for a shift in the opposite direction.

In 2024, India saw a significant drop in tea production — over 100 million kilograms — due to erratic weather, curbs on pesticide use, and reduced replantation. At the same time, domestic demand continues to rise steadily by 20–25 million kg annually, and export markets have shown signs of revival. For the first time in years, supply is likely to fall short of demand, creating a potential inflection point.

Government action has begun. The Tea Board is pushing for curbs on substandard tea and better quality enforcement, which could eliminate low-grade oversupply. The emphasis is shifting from volume to value. Like in the sugar sector a few years ago, the policy tailwind may amplify the turnaround.

The Investment Case: From Despair to Hope

In the stock market, tea companies have long traded at depressed valuations. High-quality producers like Goodricke Group, despite owning prime estates and having strong MNC parentage, are available at fractions of replacement cost. Most investors have written off the sector due to years of underperformance. Yet, this very pessimism may be the soil from which future multibaggers emerge.

As prices begin to firm up, even a modest rise in average realization can result in massive operating leverage for producers. An industry that has cut capex, cleaned up balance sheets, and become lean is well-positioned to benefit. When market cycles turn, they often catch everyone off guard — especially when the turn comes after a decade-long winter.

Conclusion: The Power of Extremes

Enantiodromia isn’t just an abstract idea — it’s a practical lens for spotting inflection points. When sectors are abandoned and left for dead, they often contain the seeds of powerful reversals. The Indian tea sector, having suffered prolonged underperformance, is showing early signs of that shift. Investors who recognize the pattern may be able to steep themselves in rich returns, brewed over years of patience and conviction.

So, the next time you sip a cup of Assam or Darjeeling, remember: in every bitter bottom lies the potential for a sweet comeback.


Disclaimer: This is not investment advice. Always do your own research before investing.

Wednesday, April 9, 2025

U.S Govt Structure


What is Congress in the USA?

Congress is the law-making body of the U.S. government.
It’s like the Parliament in India.


🔹 Congress has two parts:

  1. The Senate (like Rajya Sabha)

  2. The House of Representatives (like Lok Sabha)

Together, they’re called "The United States Congress."


1. The Senate:

  • Total of 100 Senators (2 from each of the 50 states).

  • They serve 6-year terms.

  • Seen as the "upper house."

  • More powerful when it comes to approving big decisions like:

    • Supreme Court judges

    • Treaties

    • Cabinet members (like Ministers)


2. The House of Representatives:

  • Total of 435 members.

  • Number from each state depends on population (e.g., California has more than Wyoming).

  • Serve 2-year terms.

  • This is the "lower house" but very important.

  • Controls budget, taxes, and can start impeachment.


💼 What Does Congress Do?

  • Makes laws

  • Approves budgets

  • Checks the President’s power

  • Can impeach the President (House starts it, Senate decides)


🧠 Simple Analogy:

In IndiaIn USA
ParliamentCongress
Lok SabhaHouse of Representatives
Rajya SabhaSenate
Prime MinisterPresident (elected separately)

Thursday, April 3, 2025

What Happened During Tulip Mania?

Tulip Mania is one of the most famous speculative bubbles in history. It took place in the Dutch Republic (now the Netherlands) in the early 17th century, reaching its peak in 1636-1637 before crashing dramatically.

Timeline of Tulip Mania:

  • Late 1500s - Early 1600s: Tulips were introduced to Europe from the Ottoman Empire. Their bright colors and unique petal patterns made them highly desirable.

  • 1620s: Tulips, especially rare varieties with unique color patterns (caused by a virus), became luxury items for the wealthy.

  • 1634-1636: The speculative bubble began, with traders and even common people entering the market, expecting prices to keep rising.

  • Winter of 1636-1637: The peak of the mania. Some rare tulip bulbs were reportedly being sold for more than 10 times the annual income of a skilled worker.

  • February 1637: The crash. Buyers failed to show up for a major tulip auction in Haarlem, causing panic. Prices collapsed within weeks, leaving many in financial ruin.

How High Did Tulip Prices Go?

At the peak:

  • A single Semper Augustus bulb (the most prized variety) was reportedly sold for 5,500 guilders.

  • To put this in perspective, a skilled worker earned about 150-200 guilders per year, and a luxurious canal house in Amsterdam cost around 5,000 guilders.

  • In today's money, estimates vary, but 5,500 guilders could be worth around $250,000-$500,000 in modern dollars.

Why Did It Happen?

  1. Scarcity and Perceived Value: Rare tulip bulbs took years to grow and were unpredictable in their color patterns due to a viral infection, making them even more valuable.

  2. Social Status and Luxury Appeal: Wealthy Dutch merchants flaunted rare tulips as a status symbol, much like fine art or luxury watches today.

  3. Market Speculation: People started buying tulips not to plant them but to sell them at higher prices. This led to a futures market where bulbs that had yet to bloom were being traded at extreme prices.

  4. Easy Credit & Leverage: People started using loans and collateral (even houses and land) to speculate on tulips.

  5. The Fear of Missing Out (FOMO): Many jumped in just because they saw others getting rich quickly.

Why Was It So Obvious Yet People Still Fell for It?

  • Human psychology in speculative bubbles tends to ignore fundamentals when prices keep rising. People believe "this time is different."

  • Just like the Dot-com bubble (1999-2000) or Bitcoin at $60,000+, people thought tulip prices would never fall.

  • The idea that "someone else will pay even more later" (the Greater Fool Theory) fueled the frenzy.

  • Many people got rich early in the bubble, reinforcing the belief that tulips were a legitimate investment.

Lessons from Tulip Mania

  • Markets driven by speculation, rather than fundamentals, are bound to collapse.

  • Scarcity alone doesn't justify sky-high valuations if there's no true economic utility.

  • Once confidence breaks, liquidity dries up instantly, causing a rapid price crash.

This pattern has repeated across history—South Sea Bubble (1720), Railway Mania (1840s), Roaring '20s stock market, Dot-com bubble, Crypto booms—showing that speculation cycles are deeply tied to human behavior.

Railway Mania (1840s) vs. Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000) – A Detailed Comparison

 Both Railway Mania and the Dot-Com Bubble were driven by revolutionary technologies that changed the world. However, they also saw massive speculation, unrealistic valuations, and an eventual crash. Let's break them down across multiple parameters:


1. The Core Technology Behind the Boom

ParameterRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Main Tech RevolutionRailways, steam locomotives, and faster transportation networks.The Internet, digital connectivity, and online businesses.
Core Value PropositionFaster movement of goods and people, reducing travel time by 90%.Instant access to information, digital commerce, and global connectivity.
Actual ImpactRailways reshaped economies and made industrialization much faster.The Internet changed communication, shopping, finance, and business forever.

2. Stock Market Hype & Valuation Stretch

ParameterRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Stock Price SurgeRailway stocks rose 5x-10x in a few years.Tech stocks rose 10x-50x in just a couple of years.
Valuation StretchSome railway stocks were trading at 100x+ earnings, assuming all railways would be profitable.Many dot-com companies had zero earnings but still traded at 100x+ revenue.
Craziest StockGreat Western Railway (GWR), London & Birmingham Railway.Pets.com, Webvan, AOL, Amazon (survived).
Common Speculation Pattern"Every town will need a railway, and we must invest now!""Every company must go online, so all dot-coms will succeed!"

3. Who Got Rich & Who Got Wiped Out?

ParameterRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Early WinnersEarly railway investors (wealthy industrialists, landowners, and financiers).Venture capitalists, early tech founders, investment bankers.
Late LosersMiddle-class investors who bought railway stocks at the peak.Retail investors and traders who bought tech stocks at absurd prices.
Wealth Wiped Out£80 million invested (~£10 billion today) mostly disappeared.$5 trillion in market cap vanished in two years.

4. The Crash & Aftermath

ParameterRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Crash TimelinePeaked in 1845, collapsed by 1847.Peaked in March 2000, collapsed by 2002.
Stock DeclineMany railway stocks fell 70-90%, some went to zero.Many dot-com stocks fell 90-100%, went bankrupt.
Major BankruptciesMany railway companies failed or merged.Pets.com, Webvan, eToys, and hundreds of dot-com startups vanished.
Economic ImpactBanking crisis, financial ruin for many investors.U.S. recession, massive job losses in tech, capital dried up.

5. The Long-Term Winners

ParameterRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Biggest SurvivorsLondon & North Western Railway (LNWR), Great Western Railway (GWR).Amazon, Google, eBay, PayPal, Apple.
How They Survived?Built profitable routes, better engineering, and scale advantage.Focused on real businesses, cash flow, and long-term growth.
Massive Long-Term SuccessRailways revolutionized global trade and remained the backbone of industry for 100+ years.The Internet reshaped business, and today’s biggest companies are tech giants.

6. Lessons for Investors Today

LessonRailway Mania (1840s)Dot-Com Bubble (1999-2000)
Just because it's revolutionary doesn’t mean every company will win.90% of railway companies failed. Only a few survived.90% of dot-com companies failed, but a few became trillion-dollar giants.
Overpaying for hype can wipe you out.Investors who bought rail stocks near the peak lost everything.Buying overhyped tech stocks at peak valuations led to huge losses.
Long-term winners were well-run and had real earnings.LNWR and GWR survived because they were operationally strong.Amazon and Google survived because they had real value and revenue.
Be careful of "New Economy" narratives."Railways will make everyone rich" was a flawed idea."Clicks over profits" in dot-coms led to a collapse.

Final Thought: The Cycle Always Repeats

  • Railways → Dot-Com → Crypto → AI?

  • Speculative bubbles will always exist, and history repeats itself in different forms.

  • The key lesson is to identify true long-term winners rather than chasing hype.

15 Stock Investment Tips from Rakesh Jhunjhunwala

1. Always go against tide. Buy when others are selling and sell when others are buying.  2. If you believe in the growth prospects o...